Follow this link to skip to the main content
LISA title
LISA home
LISA Science
LISA Mission
LISA Technology
LISA for Students
LISA for Scientists
LISA Media Gallery
LISA FAQ
LISA FAQ
FAQ
In 1967, the first radio pulsar was discovered by Jocelyn Bell and Anthony Hewish. Pulsars were quickly identified as neutron stars, the incredibly compressed remnants of the supernova explosions of main-sequence stars. In 1974, Russel Hulse and Joseph Taylor discovered the first binary pulsar, PSR 1913+16, a system of two neutron stars (only one emitting as a pulsar) with an orbital period of eight hours. As shown in the figure, the orbit of the binary decays exactly as expected for system of accelerated masses that lose energy to gravitational waves.

Image: Weisberg and Taylor 2004
We don't know gravitational waves exist, so isn't LISA premature?
True, we have not yet achieved the direct detection of gravitational waves, but we have overwhelming evidence that they exist. We observe that the orbits of binary pulsars lose orbital energy and shrink exactly at the rate predicted by general relativity because of emission of gravitational radiation. Thus, we are confident that general relativity describes gravitational waves correctly. What LISA will do is use those waves to learn about the astrophysics of dark objects that can be seen in no other way, and to probe strong-field gravity, for which we have no other test.

Back to Top

If gravitational waves exist, why bother to look for them?
LISA's goal is not to discover low frequency gravitational waves, but to use them as a new window into astrophysical and physical phenomena that cannot be studied in other ways. For instance, LISA will observe the lighter massive black holes that do not have enough matter around them to be visible as active galactic nuclei.

As for physics, we know that Einstein's general relativity is a very good description of weak-field gravity (i.e., in the neighborhood of relatively light bodies, or far enough from more massive bodies); but we have only circumstantial evidence for its validity in the strong-field regime (e.g., near the event horizon of a black hole). LISA will shed light into this physics, revealing whether the massive rotating objects at the center of galaxies are really described by the "vacuum Kerr solution" of general relativity, or are more exotic and unexpected.

Back to Top

Can't LISA science be done from the ground with LIGO?
No. LISA and LIGO are complementary because they look at entirely different sources with different astrophysics. Observations by LIGO at frequencies between 10 and 1000 Hertz (oscillations per second) will reveal the mergers of neutron star binaries and stellar-mass black holes. Seismic activity and mass motions on the Earth prevent LIGO from looking at lower frequencies, and for heavier systems.

By contrast, the much longer LISA baseline and the quietness of space allows LISA to work between 0.03 milliHertz and 1 Hertz, the band of gravitational-wave emission for the much more massive black holes found in galactic centers. Thus, LISA will give us new insight about the initial formation and growth of these black holes, as far as the edge of the observable Universe.

Back to Top

How can we be sure that LISA will see gravitational wave sources?
From "conventional" electromagnetic astronomy we know of several compact compact binaries in the Galaxy that are already emitting gravitational waves in the LISA band, and only await for it to be launched. In fact, we expect LISA to observe thousands more such binaries that we have not yet seen with telescopes. The rates of merger events that involve massive black holes are uncertain, but LISA can see these even if they are very far (at "redshifts" up to 20), so even the most pessimistic rate estimates allow LISA many exciting discoveries.

Back to Top

Although multiple gravitational-wave signals are present simultaneously in the LISA data, individual sources can be teased out by "tuning" to them. This figure exemplifies the overlapping frequency content of the sources included in the second Mock LISA Challenge, an exercise undertaken by LISA scientists to demonstrate the recovery of individual simulated signals from LISA instrument noise. Parameters for several massive black-hole binaries and for twenty thousand Galactic binaries were extracted from this dataset.

Image: M. Vallisneri/JPL
Since LISA is sensitive to all of the sources at the same time, won't there be source confusion?
LISA is similar to a radiotelescope in that it measures both the strength and phase (i.e., the oscillation) of signals. Much like a radio receiver, LISA can be tuned to zero in to a specific source, silencing all others; but the tuning happens at the time of data analysis, without disturbing the instrument. Thus, it will be possible to separate many sources this way. It is true that there will be interference between sources that appear at the same frequency, such as some galactic binaries, but LISA will still be able to detect and characterize thousands of them without confusion.

Back to Top

How does LISA get positions for its sources?
LISA's response is not very directional, but its orbital motion around the Sun results in a modulation of long-lived signals in both amplitude and phase as the LISA "antenna pattern" of sensitivity sweeps across the position of the source. This modulation can help determine sky position, typically to about one degree. Another way to look at this is that during a year LISA establishes an observational baseline of two astronomical units (the Earth-to-Sun distance).

Back to Top

How do the three spacecraft get into the proper orbits?
The three spacecraft are stacked vertically in a single launch vehicle, each attached to a propulsion module. Once launched, the spacecraft separate and follow three independent trajectories to their final orbital injection points, taking 10-13 months to arrive "on station." Once there, each spacecraft separates from its propulsion module and begins the process of setting up laser links with the other two.

Back to Top